Specialist clinical feedback for medical AI teams. From preference rankings for RLHF to reference answers for SFT, we help you identify errors, improve training examples and understand clinical risk.
Clinical review and expert-authored data for AI developers, evaluation teams and specialist data partners. Each engagement has a named reviewer, agreed criteria and defined outputs.
01
Expert-in-the-loop RLHF
Clinical feedback to support reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF): compare model responses, rank preferences, flag factual and safety issues, and explain each judgement against an agreed rubric.
Specialist-authored reference answers, corrections and fictional clinical scenarios for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) datasets. Agree the clinical scope and acceptance criteria before each batch.
DELIVERY: REFERENCE RESPONSES + REVIEW CRITERIA
03
Clinical content review
Check generated summaries and educational content for factual errors, important omissions and unsupported conclusions. Provide actionable corrections.
DELIVERY: ANNOTATIONS + CORRECTIONS
04
Surgical computer vision annotation
Discuss image or video annotation with a relevant specialist, including anatomy, instruments or procedural phases. We assess the material, label definitions, platform requirements and a calibration sample before confirming delivery.
START WITH: FEASIBILITY + ANNOTATION SCOPE
A CLEAR REVIEW PROCESS
From a defined question to explained findings.
Agree the scope first. Make the criteria explicit. Keep the reasoning behind every finding visible.
01
Scope
Define the use case, specialty, language and output format. Confirm the appropriate reviewer.
02
Calibrate
Review a small sample together and agree how the scoring criteria should be applied.
03
Evaluate
Record scores, supporting explanations and proposed corrections. Resolve or flag uncertainty.
04
Deliver
Return structured findings, recurring error patterns and a discussion of the results and limits.
SPECIALTY MATCHING MATTERS
A second review is included only when it is agreed and an appropriately qualified reviewer is available. Each report describes the review actually performed.
THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE REVIEW
Clinical reviewers.
Two distinct specialties. Every assignment is matched to the relevant expertise and current clinical practice of the reviewer.
NEUROSURGERY
Dr Hazim Al-Zyoud
FEBNS · MHBA
Consultant Neurosurgeon & Chief of Spine Surgery
German-board-certified neurosurgeon experienced in general neurosurgery, brain and spinal tumours, neurotrauma and complex spine surgery.
Selected qualifications
German specialist certification in Neurosurgery, 2017
Fellow of the European Board of Neurological Surgery, 2018
Master Certificate of Spine Surgery, German Spine Society, 2022
Master of Health Business Administration, 2025
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMA SURGERY
Dr Ala Alsharif
M.D. · FEBOT
Specialist in Orthopaedics & Trauma Surgery
German-board-certified specialist in orthopaedics and trauma surgery. His recent consultant practice focuses on minimally invasive and endoscopic spine surgery.
Selected qualifications
German specialist certification in Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 2021
Fellow of the European Board of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2024
EUROSPINE Diploma, 2025
Basic Spine Certificate, German Spine Society, 2025
WHERE OUR EXPERTISE MEETS
Spine surgery brings two perspectives together. Where both doctors' expertise applies, independent reviews can be compared and differences documented.
DATA SECURITY & COMPLIANCE
Define the controls. Then begin the review.
Data access and handling requirements belong in the pilot scope. Agree the environment and contractual requirements before sharing review material.
01
Client-controlled access
Request a workflow in your virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) or an approved annotation environment. Platform suitability, named-user access and permitted exports are confirmed during scoping.
02
Retention & local handling
Set local-download restrictions, retention periods and deletion requirements in the project agreement. A no-local-copy workflow can be assessed against the client environment before access is granted.
03
GDPR & project agreements
Where personal data is involved, confirm the applicable data-processing agreement, processing locations and any subprocessors with your team before access. Security requirements are assessed for the actual project and deployment.
Start the conversation with a description or synthetic example. Please do not send identifiable patient data by email.
A PAID PILOT WITH A DEFINED SCOPE
One use case. Clear deliverables.
Start with a small, paid evaluation batch in an agreed specialty. Confirm the reviewer, method, data environment, acceptance criteria, timeline and fixed fee before work begins.
Case-level scores, rankings or reference responses
Written reasoning, corrections and open questions
A concise findings report and review discussion
Findings apply to the reviewed material and agreed scope. This review does not establish whole-product clinical validation or regulatory approval.
REQUEST A PAID PILOT
Bring us a use case. We will scope the review.
Tell us the clinical specialty, workflow, language, sample size and target timeline. Include your preferred review platform or VDI requirements. Please keep identifiable patient data out of your enquiry.